Christianity Is Evil|
[Most Recent Entries]
Below are the 12 most recent journal entries recorded in
|Friday, November 11th, 2005|
|Feeding the Vampire
Within the model of Christianity, Jesus was (and is) an innocent man. For "'god' the father" to not give a rat's-ass where the "sin atoning" blood comes from, the guilty or the innocent, belies any so called semblance of "Justice". This exposes that what is really being considered is not a matter of justice, mercy, "grace", morality or compassion, but rather it is simply a matter of considering the series of rationalizations behind continuing to feed the vampire named 'god'.
|Thursday, November 10th, 2005|
|Wednesday, November 9th, 2005|
|'god' is a Vampire
Website: http://www.christianityisevil.com/god_is_a_vampire.htmlKilling terrified animals for fun and profit:
It all started with Cain and Able offering their sacrifices to "the lord". Cain the farmer offered up fruits and veggies & Able slaughtered an animal or two to make 'god' happy. Apparently the "broccoli sacrifice" wasn't as impressive as the rump roast sacrifice because 'god' chastised Cain about it. This pissed Cain off to the point that he thought "Hell, I've give you a blood offering" and bashed Able's head in. 'god' didn't like this too much but oddly enough seemed to not have a problem with human sacrifice at a later date. After 'god' got a taste for the blood of the innocent, he started demanding it on a constant basis. It seems that 'god' not only needs constant affection and ego-boosting, but he needs to eat animal fat and drink "clean" fresh blood of the "blemish-free" innocent. The more innocent the better. Leviticus 1-9 is about practically nothing else but lessons on how to horrifically slaughter innocent animals and their slinging their blood and entrails about.
Why does 'god' love to savour blood so much?( Read more...Collapse )
|$10,000.00 Cash Prize Offer
Website at http://www.christianityisevil.com
To be awarded by me to anyone who can prove the existence of the supernatural or paranormal.
Since supernature must exist for a supernatural God to exist, then proof of the existence of supernature is a prerequisite for any consideration of a supernatural God is to be taken seriously.
Religions give us ubiquitous warnings about things from the 'demon haunted worlds' to evade at all cost. Things such as demons and devils; incubi and succubae; magic performing witches and wizards; fortunetellers-soothsayers; magic rings, amulets, necklaces and so on; gargoyles and dragons, et al. If such things are a real ubiquitous threat, then offering proof that a supernatural realm where 'supernature' things exist should be child's play.
What I require as proof is the acceptance of such by the Nobel panel in physics. So, when Mr. Amazing wins the Nobel prize in physics for discovering another realm or supernatural power/presence in our universe (and collects James Randy's cool mil I might add), my offer of $10,000.00 will be given with no strings attached. This is on top of the prize of 10,000,000.00 Swedish Crowns paid to all Nobel Laureates, so this is no small thing.
(Date offer first posted and initiated on my sister site www.thailoversdomain.com and yet unclaimed:
February 23rd, 2004; 09:00 GMT)
(Date offer increased from $5,000.00 to $10,000.00 on both sites August 31st, 2005; 06:00 GMT)
|Standards of Value
Website at http://www.christianityisevil.com/Standards_of_Value.html
If we use ‘god’ as our primary & moral standard of value, then whatever this ‘god’ wants is “good” and whatever it does not want is “bad” or “evil”. Such a ‘god’ could do no wrong because whatever it did would be the definition of “right”. It eating human babies for no reason would be "good". It stomping on people for no real reason would be "good". We can intuitively see where this conflicts with common sense if we are to consider that we have inherent worth because under this standard, we would have to say that a ‘god’ who capriciously slays first born babies in Egypt for no real good reason would be “good” simply because it wanted it. This would mean that it would be no less good if it destroyed people (who I will show later to have inherent value) than if it didn’t arbitrarily destroy people. This is to suggest that a value is equal in value to a non-value, which is a logically false notion.
If we instead substituted society for this 'god' as our standard of value, then we have almost EXACTLY the same situation. There would be times when what the "society" (actually the spokespeople for that society) wanted would conflict with what is “good” for us individuals. It is illogical for us ( Read more...Collapse )
See webpage at http://www.christianityisevil.com/morality.html
Christians love to make mention that it is only by 'god' that we can have any morality at all. Of course, this is (a) unfounded, (b) suggests that philosophy and ethics are nothing, (c) ignores the fact that there are plenty of moral secularists and (d) ignores the fact that the ancient Jews thought that they were moral and everyone else in their known-about little flat world were heathens, but WE PEOPLE TODAY know that there was a whole round world full of people who weren't trying to steal little Jewish girls for wives, etc. The idea that "The Ten Commandments" are the foundation for modern morality is a laughable and throwback idea. These ancient Jews are the same "moral foundationalists" that advocated stoning to death your recalcitrant lippy kids.
Morality is choosing between "right" and "wrong", which of course necessitates an understanding of what is 'right and wrong' and begs the question, 'right or wrong to whom' and necessitates a philosophical understanding ( Read more...Collapse )CHRISTIANITY IS NOT A MORAL SYSTEM.
|The Fall, my cursory theory
Webpage at http://www.christianityisevil.com/The_Fall.html
My "main theory" if you will is an interpretation of Redemption. My interpretation of The Fall is a cursory theory that my main theory is not dependent upon however it accentuates the main theme. The reason for this is (a), my Redemption theory does not require my The Fall theory to be true, and (b) My Redemption theory is based on Pauline Christianity, whereas my The Fall theory is based on my interpretation of Genesis 3. Genesis 3 posses such a problem to Judeo/Christianity that the Septuagint's Book of Wisdom, chapter 2 simply redefined "die" etc just so 'god' in the story does not turn out to be a liar (a point later popularized by Paul with the 'death entered in' crap).
"The Fall" is the supposed fall of mankind described in Genesis chapter 3, where Adam and "The Woman" (who no one bothered to give a name until they were being kicked out of Eden) supposedly went against the will of 'god' and caused an inheritable "sin" and thus all of mankind is screwed. Jews believe that one can 'get good with 'god'' via "acts" and following 'the law' given to Moses. Pauline Christianity teaches that one finds "salvation" through faith in Jesus Christ only, even though( Read more...Collapse )
Original webpage at http://www.christianityisevil.com/Interesting_Arguments.html
(Make note that these are logical arguments. I'm not saying that they are actual truth, i.e. facts about objective reality. I'm suggesting that as logical arguments they are valid as long as it is true that if the premises are all true then the conclusion is always necessarily true as well. What makes valid logical arguments interesting is that they are as true as any other 'truth'. If the 'true' conclusion is absurd, then there is something stinky in Denmark for the believer to deal with, or that they should deal with.)
A. Pauline Christianity suggests that original sin makes sin inevitable for everyone born "of man".
B. Pauline Christianity also suggests that 'god' sending people to hell is a just, proportionate and fair punishment for sinning and that everyone goes to hell as they deserve unless they 'go through Jesus'.
C. Christian conservatives propound the principle of personal responsibility as a virtue.
D. "Christian" is not defined as someone who turns the other cheek and loves his enemy; otherwise Mahatma Gandhi and Buddha would be Christians. A Christian is defined as someone, for their own personal gain and profit, worshiping the torture and death of Jesus, a good and innocent man, so that they themselves can evade being sent to hell by the (sadistic) 'god' named Yahweh. E1. Therefore conservative Christians should accept the responsibility of their own sin-debts to 'god' instead of having innocent Jesus pay for their sins with his blood. Instead of profiting from the torture and death of the good and innocent, they should be responsible enough to pay their own just debts and stop freeloading.
Conservative Christians should step up, pay their own debts and go to hell.
E2. To be a Christian is irresponsible behavior, whether the Christian is conservative or not because they are abdicating responsibility for their own sins and want Jesus to pay for their sins for them with his blood and suffering (which I contend is also evil).
A. In Matthew 15, the Pharisees criticized Jesus for not washing his hands before breaking bread and Jesus ( Read more...Collapse )
|Brain Benders and Perplexing Puzzles
(Includes some 'oldies but goodies" & has nothing to do with Chrsitianity being evil) Click here for original webpage with puzzles and links to answershttp://www.thailoversdomain.com/Brain_Bendershome.html
If it is raining, then it is not raining hard.
It is raining hard.
Therefore it is not raining.
Is this logically valid?
Why or why not?
Three brothers do some yard work for a neighbor in exchange for pay.
Reese, the oldest brother arranged the terms of payment and the distribution of the pay amongst his brothers, Malcolm (the one in the middle) and Dewie, the youngest.
Reese will get one half of the total amount made, Malcolm will get one third and Dewie will receive one ninth. They receive a total of $17.00 in one dollar bills and no one has change. "You're such a bonehead" Malcolm tells Reese, "not only does a half, a third and a ninth not add up to a whole but we can't split up 17 one dollar bills in any event!
"No way, you're just trying to trick me out of getting half the money" responded Reese. Then Dewie speaks up and says, "I talked to my imaginary friend Mr. Bigglesworth and he's going to do us a momentary favor that will solve all our problems".
What favor does Dewie ask of his imaginary friend and how does it solve all their problems? ( Read more...Collapse )
|Redemption:My main theory as to why Christianity is evil
Original website: http://www.christianityisevil.com/Redemption.html
In order to talk intelligently about Christianity, one must first define what Christianity IS and IS NOT.
Christianity IS NOT about following the teachings of Jesus.
If loving one's enemy and/or neighbor or 'turning the other cheek' made one a Christian, then Mahatma Gandhi and Buddha would have been Christians.
A set can be described as a group that includes as members "objects" that have properties or characteristics that offer necessary and sufficient reason for belonging to that group. Obviously, there are people who "turn the other cheek" who are not Christians. "Christian" is defined as someone, for their own personal gain and profit, worshiping the torture and death of Jesus, a good and innocent man, so that they themselves can evade being sent to hell by the (sadistic) 'god' named Yahweh. Jesus was a "sin offering"
to Yahweh within the context of Pauline Christianity.
Notice one thing about the bible. There are countless CLAIMS and declarations that 'god' is good and loving, endlessly benevolent, and so on. Many of these claims are by biblical Jesus. BUT when the bible actually describes what this 'god' (allegedly) DOES, it is usually some sort of horrific evil.
"The Fall" and "Redemption" are no exception. ( Read more...Collapse )
|Logical Athesim while standing on one foot.
Original webpage: http://www.thailoversdomain.com/LogicalAtheism.html
In the nature of the story about a "heathen" that once asked Rabbi Akiva to explain the Torah while standing on one foot, and the like minded challenge to Ayn Rand to explain her Objectivist philosophy while doing the same, I will attempt to also present a brief explanation of why atheism is simply the correct logical and epistemological stance to take.
Can I explain why *atheism is the correct logical line of reasoning while standing on one foot?
Here’s rational atheism in a nutshell, or rather, in six brief points. Point 1: Definition of Atheism.
ALL atheists possess no belief in any 'god' or 'gods'.
SOME atheists ALSO possess a belief that there are no 'gods'.
The latter is a subset of the former.
So when the theist says, "atheists (meaning all atheists) believe that there is no 'god'", they are making a catagorial error. (Usually in order to create a straw man agument to attack). Point 2: Science and Religion:( Read more...Collapse )
|Why Christianity is evil, in a nutshell.
original webpage: http://www.christianityisevil.com/Christianity_is_evil_nutshell.html
A quick synopsis:
Original sin came about because A&E took what was obviously bait. They made up their own minds for once in an un-slavelike manner and thus mankind was doomed for having a "forefather" (and foremother) that was not satisfied with being dumb animals.
The four lettered word (YHWH), referred to as Jesus' father and arguably his other evil schizophrenic personality, told him to walk into the metaphorical plane propeller or the world's entire population is going to get torched for failing a test of perfection that can't be passed and is supposedly our fault.
Jesus begged his father to not force him to accept torture and death as the ultimate martyr whipping boy for the planet. He begged at least three times for the four lettered word to take this cup from him, (i.e. he did not want to die) but was callously ignored. Jesus in Mark 14 followed the four lettered word's will, not his own. He was acting under duress.
The four lettered word's plan was carried out; a good, moral and innocent man was tortured and crucified just as daddy wanted it.
The four lettered word now offers a plea bargain to each Christian in tow. Either they say that forcing Jesus to take the fall for the planet when the game was rigged from the beginning is "love" and "moral" or they themselves will be tortured in hell. The Christian is forced to use the shed blood of the innocent to buy their way out of hell, called "atonement", and to call this threat an example of "love" and "grace" or they in turn will burn in hell if they don't. What's worse, they must believe it, which requires them to focus on the
"love = surrender 'till self-destruction" idea of Jesus' martyr-istic death while living in neurotic denial about the apparent evil of the paternal four letter word (type-2 Christian), or they consider the Christian model as a whole, but must give up any semblance of being a moral being in order to cope (type-3 Christian).
(See "Three types of Christians")
Point 1 is Evil.
Point 2 is Evil.
Point 3 is Evil.
Point 4 is Evil.
Point 5 is Evil.
Conclusion: Pauline Christianity is an evil concept and model, theoretical or not.
If it's mere theory and nothing else, then it's evil in theory.
Within the model of Christianity, Jesus was (and is) an innocent man. For "'god' the father" to not give a rat's ass where the "sin atoning" blood comes from, the guilty or the innocent, belies any so called semblance of "Justice". This exposes that what is really being considered is not a matter of justice, mercy, "grace" or compassion, but rather it is simply a matter of considering the series of rationalizations behind continuing to feed the vampire named 'god'.
Ephesians 5:2 (KJV)
"...and hath given himself for us an offering and a sacrifice to God for a sweetsmelling savour."
Mmm-mmm. Isn't the innocent blood of Jesus tasty?
To reitterate, even if Christianity is nothing but mere theory, then it is evil even in theory.
"For there is no respect of persons with God."
"...God is no respecter of persons."
Acts 10:34 (KJV)
"As it is written: "For your sake we are being slain all the day; we are looked upon as sheep to be slaughtered."
--Romans 8:36 (NAB)
"He hath utterly destroyed them, he hath delivered them to the slaughter. Their slain also shall be cast out, and their stink
shall come up out of their carcasses, and the mountains shall be melted with their blood."--Isaiah 34:2-3
"For my sword shall be bathed in heaven. The sword of the Lord is filled with blood."--Isaiah 34:5-6
"And I will cause them to eat the flesh of their sons and the flesh of their daughters, and they shall eat every one the flesh of his friend in the siege and straitness, wherewith their enemies, and they that seek their lives, shall straiten them. "--Jeremiah 19:9 (KJV)
"The hands of the pitiful women have sodden their own children: they were their meat."--Lamentations 4:10 (KJV)
"For it is written, I will destroy the wisdom of the wise, and will bring to nothing the understanding of the prudent."
--1 Cornithians 1:19 (KJV)
"I will bring evil upon all flesh, saith the Lord."--Jeremiah 45:5(KJV)